In the article, “Jesus Is a Brand of Jeans,” Jean Killbourne
writes about the world of advertising and what affects it is having on our
culture. Kilbourne explains how advertising has become an appeal to emotion,
whether it is the desire to be gorgeous or the longing to fit in. The
advertising world has made an appeal to our emotion. Kilbourne masterfully does
this as well by the title of the piece, “Jesus Is a Brand of Jeans.” In some this
insight outrage and in others a desire to wear a pair of Jeans with such a
“cool” title. She appeals to our desire to help children by saying, “They us
their knowledge to target children (because if you hook them early they are
yours for life).” To many, this would be grotesque especially in the area of
addiction. However, as she points out, “…While we’re laughing, sometimes
sneering, the commercial does its work. To Kilbourne, advertisements make us
vulnerable and appeal to everyone’s emotional desire.
Kilbourne writes this piece to entertain as well as educate
the subscribers to the New Internationalist Magazine where this was originally
published. Kilbourne has written several books on advertising and is well known
for her research on the subject. She gives this piece a catchy title that is
sure to attract the reading of some curious passerby. Furthermore, this essay
has been reprinted in a book called, Common
Culture, for the consumption of college students, learning about a pathos
style of argument.
Kilbourne masterfully uses the essay format for her article
and while not using a wide range of media to communicate her argument, we can
still visualize the entire things because of the subject matter. This works
well in her favor as she attempts to convince us of the “cynicism,
dissatisfaction, and craving,” that advertisement creates.
In this article, Kilbourne writes by giving examples. She
lets examples speak for her, and she uses a couple of headings to direct the
reader’s attention. She starts the piece with an example of the way
advertisement strips away at everything dear, sacred, religious, sketchy,
racist. She then communicates for the majority of the article by bringing up
one advertisement scheme after another that illustrates man’s desire for more,
true love, or just someone to take care of them. In conclusion, she
communicates her own opinion about the world advertising is creating. She
states explicitly that advertisers aren’t evil people. Instead she says, “More
thought, more effort, more money goes in advertising than has gone into any
other campaign to change social consciousness.” She then says, “And the major
motivating force for social change throughout the world today is this belief
that happiness comes from the market.” This, to Kilbourne, is the world of
advertising.
Benjamin, I can definitely see improvement here. You should be encouraged by that. Please know that I understand how much work this required of you, but you should know (now on the other side of these reading responses) that the improvement is evident to me--that you are analyzing more specifically, that your organization is more obvious and easy to read, and that you have a much better focus. I promise that this unit will exercise and tighten your analytical skills, all things which happen cognitively. Analysis is a skill under taught and under appreciated, until someone needs someone else who can do it--to look at a mess of phenomena and to find coherent patterns and intentions within that mess, then to move and create coherent articulations of those patterns and intentions.
ReplyDeleteThat said, your last paragraph rightly talks about her use of examples (Cicero called that accumulatio--to amass a wealth of examples to overwhelm and compel audiences). But I"m not sure you take the next step there to state how this is affecting the audience in question. Recall that this analysis will likely take three steps;
1) State the strategy (using evidence/example)
2) State why this effective which entails,
---stating why the audience is convinced by this
---stating why the rhetorical situation called for this
I think you've just about got it.