Monday, June 24, 2013

Research Proposal


Benjamin Dorin

“Women and Children First?:” A Critique of the Chivalry of the Twentieth Century 

Introduction 

I conjecture that Chivalry, known as being a gentleman, has suffered greatly in the past 100 years. From the sinking of the Titanic until now, we have seen a decline in how men view women, treat women, and behave in regards to women. This can been seen in the many television ads and newspaper advertisements that have elevated the woman to the status of objects, as if that was an elevation at all. Furthermore, as you progress from the early twentieth century until now, from the rise of the industrial revolution to the sixties and seventies, you can see a shift in how woman want to be treated and seen by men. Thus, as I look at the trends of the past 100 years and read several articles dealing with the subject, it seems to me that chivalry has become a thing of the past in today’s world.

For my research, I will be asking and exploring several questions: How have events in the past changed how we treat women? How do women want to be treated by men? Have we actually seen a change of how men view women in the past 100 years.

Method 

In order to accomplish this goal, I will first be sitting and watching people interact at the mall as well as at the store. While I observe, I will be looking to see if men carry their women’s groceries, push their carts, and hold the door open for them. I will also be looking to see how men respond in a crisis, such as something going missing, a purse being stolen, a jammed finger. Are the men nurturing, protecting, loving, or are they missive, uninterested, or expect the women to take care of it on their own? 

Next, I will interview several “random” men and women on campus and at other campuses around the area, as well as in down town Ames to see what the culture says on the subject. This will help broaden my viewpoint and help me gain incite into the culture’s perspective. 

Furthermore, I will be talking to some social historians to see what trends they have seen. These approaches will help give me a more well rounded view of my topic and help me develop a better argument and thesis statement. 

Lastly, I will consult articles of newspapers and books that have been written either as a history of different events in the past or as topical analyses of my research project. In doing this, I hope to find out what men and women of the past have seen in their era on the subject of chivalry.

Sources 

To begin, I will be looking at the artifact written by Henry Moseman titled, “The Science of Chivalry.” This is an article that looks at the sinking of the Titanic and asks, “what happened there and why? Why do we not see men saying, ‘woman and children first’ today? After that, I will examine a book written by Walter Lord (1917 – 2002) titled, “A Night to Remember.” It is written like a fictional piece but instead is quite historic. Walter Lord interviewed over fifty survivors of the Titanic before writing it. In addition to these sources, I will examine newspapers from the 1920’s to the 1970’s. 

Timeline: 

June 24: Research proposal is due 

June 24: Observe people interact at the store. Set up two interviews on Iowa State’s campus.

June 25: Go to down town Ames and observe men and women’s behavior towards each other. 

June 26: Begin writing and formulating my argument on paper.

June 28: Video record people as I interview them.

June 29: Begin setting up my power point presentation

July 1: First Draft Done 

Significance: 

In society, we have seen a progression of how women and men treat each other. For 100 years, society has been on a general decline as to how women are portrayed. These ideas and practices, such as advertisements using women’s bodies or the sexual harassment directed at women, are a direct result of not treating women as someone to nurture, take care of, protect. Moseman points out in his article, "The Science of Chivalry," that what was seen on the Titanic in allowing women and children off the boat first was social norms triumphing over selfishness. Thus, it is crucial to ask the questions, what happened to those social norms and why do they not prevail today?

Friday, June 14, 2013

Reflection: Rhetorical Analysis


I chose to do my rhetorical analysis assignment on “Jesus Is A Brand of Jeans” by Dr. Jean Kilbourne. This major assignment came after practicing rhetorically analyzing material with five other smaller assignments. Through this process, I have learned how to look at the context, style, delivery, organization, and persuasiveness of what I am analyzing.

In addition to doing a rhetorical analysis, I was required to do a presentation on the subject of my analysis. During the process of preparing the speech, it became evident that I did not necessarily know how to organize my slide into a unique, concise manner that would attract my audience. While I chose a pattern for the power-point presentation I would do, I knew I was an amateur. That said, I am looking forward to the opportunity to further develop my skills in the future.

In presenting the following are things I need to work on:
  •           Having more control over my voice, the pitch, and the tone of it. ( I came across very loud during this presentation.)
  •           Creating a more concise, more descriptive power-point
  •            Utilizing audio and other forms of media to convey my message

Overall, I felt the presentation went well and was good practice for the future.

During the process of rhetorical analysis, I have grown in some ways and still need much improvement in others.

Things to Work On:
  •         Starting more broad and moving to narrow
  •         Recommending the piece I am analyzing for its strength of argument and not its subject.
  •         Not being so focused on details that I miss the main message.

Things I am better at than before:
  •         Looking at a piece, knowing how to pick out the main idea, analyze it and ask questions like, “Did the author accomplish his or her goal,” “Was the argument clear and effective,” etc.
  •         I am becoming increasingly comfortable writing.
  •         Also, the things I listed above as things I need to work on are things I am able to do, but not able to do necessarily well.

Furthermore, I have learned to interact with my peers in group projects as well as receive constructive criticism on the essay I was writing to fulfill my assignment. During a peer response session, Katey Sapp gave me helpful points as to how to improve my piece in clarity, organization, and general structure. I utilized most of what she suggested.

Overall, I have enjoyed the process of learning to write rhetorically and present my work to others. That said, I still have a lot of work to do and will be seeking to not only complete the assignments for English 250 but do rhetorical analysis throughout the rest of my life

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Peer Response 2

I wrote my rhetorical analysis on the article by Jean Kilbourne titled, Jesus is A Brand of Jeans. My peer that gave me a response was Katey Sapp. She gave me several important comments that I can utilize in making my write up better. She included helpful quotes to include in my piece as well as pointed out that I need incite - citations. Katey did her rhetorical analysis on the exact same subject. This was helpful, because she knew what I was talking about and could provide helpful insight. I will be utilizing a majority of her comments.